Okay, it's looking more and more like CBS f'd this one up pretty bad, especially when you consider that it wasn't necessary to forge any documents, because simply talking to the people who worked with him will tell you that Lt. Col. Killian agreed with the sentiments in those memos, whether those particular memos are genuine or not. Why are journalists these day so unwilling to go into more depth? It seems like they (and most of the public) just parrot the most recent lie and move on. It's like they're totally unfamiliar with the concept of depth, or even follow-up questions. Thanks, CBS, for making this about two pieces of paper now, instead of about whether the man in the Oval Office coasted through life on his father's coattails.
No comments:
Post a Comment